On berberine, two opposing viewpoints exist, and the error lies in choosing a side. On one hand, published clinical trials, catalogued in PubMed, which describe a molecule generally well tolerated, with adverse effects that are essentially digestive. On the other hand, theANSES, which published in November 2019 guidance recommending that several populations avoid consuming it.
Both are right, because they are not talking about the same thing. A clinical trial measures what happens to selected and monitoredparticipants. A health agency evaluates what happens when the same molecule is sold freely to people taking treatments. This article presents both, with their figures, and the decisive fact: berberine is currently undergoing pharmaceutical development in Phase 2 and 3 trials.
What clinical trials show. An umbrella review of 11 meta-analyses concludes that common adverse effects are digestive, constipation and diarrhea. In a randomized trial versus placebo involving 1108 participants published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, the most frequent effect was constipation, in 1% of berberine participants compared to less than 0.5% in the placebo group, and no serious adverse effects were reported. In a trial in diabetics at 1.5 g per day, 34.5% presented with transient digestive disorders, with no observed hepatic or renal impairment.
What ANSES says. Proven pharmacological effects from 400 mg per day, a threshold likely exceeded by many products. Recommendation to not consume for children and adolescents, pregnant or breastfeeding women, people with diabetes and people with hepatic or cardiac disorders. Caution regarding drug interactions. The distinguishing fact: berberine is in development as a medication, with phase 2 trials published in JAMA Network Open and Nature Communications.
What clinical trials measure
Let's start with what is measured in humans in published trials referenced on PubMed. This is the highest level of evidence available on this molecule.
| Study | Population and dose | Reported adverse effects |
|---|---|---|
| Chen et al., 2020 Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol |
1108 randomized participants, berberine 0.3 g twice daily versus placebo, followed for up to 2 years | Constipation most frequent: 6 participants out of 446 on berberine (1%) versus 1 out of 478 on placebo. No serious adverse effects reported |
| Yin et al., 2008 Metabolism |
Adults with type 2 diabetes, 0.5 g three times daily, totaling 1.5 g per day, 3 months | 20 patients out of 58 (34.5%) experienced transient digestive disorders. No liver or kidney functional impairment observed |
| Nie et al., 2024 J Transl Med |
Meta-analysis of 10 randomized trials, 811 patients, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease | Only mild digestive effects reported |
| Li et al., 2023 Phytother Res |
Umbrella review of 11 meta-analyses of randomized trials | Common effects: gastrointestinal symptoms, constipation and diarrhea. Methodological quality of meta-analyses needs improvement |
The message is consistent from one study to another: digestive disorders are the constant adverse effect, their frequency increases with dose, and serious effects are absent from published trials. This is useful information, and it would be dishonest to pass over it in silence for dramatic effect.
Three limitations that explain the rest of this article. Participants are selected : pregnant women, children, and often people on multiple treatments are generally excluded. They are monitored : regular check-ups, discontinuation if any abnormality is detected. Durations are limited, from a few weeks to two years. A clinical trial therefore measures what happens under controlled conditions, not what happens when the same molecule is sold freely to someone already taking three medications. The 2023 umbrella review moreover emphasizes itself the need for trials with better methodological quality.
What the Anses says, and why it's not contradictory
Referred by the DGCCRF on April 12, 2018, Anses published its opinion on November 25, 2019. Its conclusions do not concern the frequency of adverse effects in trials, but the conditions of safe use in over-the-counter sales.
| Anses Conclusion | What this means |
|---|---|
| Confirmed pharmacological effects | From 400 mg per day: blood pressure and heart rate, nervous system, immune system, metabolism. It is not ruled out that these effects exist at lower doses |
| Safe use not guaranteed | This threshold is likely exceeded by a large number of products on the French market |
| Identified risks | Gastrointestinal disorders, hypoglycemia, hypotension |
| Interactions | Call to healthcare professionals for the utmost vigilance: taking a treatment in parallel may inhibit its effects or lead to adverse effects |
A clinical trial answers the question: what happens in selected and monitored participants? Answer: mainly digestive disorders. A health agency answers a different question: what happens when this molecule is sold over-the-counter? Answer: it is purchased by diabetic people, by people on treatment, at uncapped doses, without biological monitoring. Both findings are accurate, and they do not contradict each other. A molecule well tolerated within a framework can pose a problem outside this framework.
Note moreover the consistency of the figures. The 2008 trial used 1.5 g per day, that of the Lancet 0.6 g per day : these doses are both far exceeding the 400 mg per day threshold where Anses places pharmacological effects. Clinical literature therefore confirms, indirectly, that the agency set its threshold in the right place.
The decisive fact: a drug in development
Here is the element that should settle any debate on the question "harmless supplement or active substance."
Berberine, in the form of berberine ursodesoxycholate, is the subject of a pharmaceutical development program. A randomized phase 2 trial versus placebo in 113 type 2 diabetic patients was published in JAMA Network Open in 2025, with significant and dose-dependent reductions in glycated hemoglobin, and phase 3 trials underway. Another phase 2 trial, published in Nature Communications in 2021 in 100 patients with steatohepatitis and diabetes, reported a significant reduction in liver fat, with diarrhea and abdominal discomfort as the most frequent adverse effects.
Phase 2 and 3 trials are not conducted on a substance without effect. Berberine is being developed as a drug, with the evaluation protocol that comes with it: predefined primary endpoints, comparison against placebo, monitoring of adverse effects, regulatory authorities. Meanwhile, the same molecule is sold in capsules with no dose ceiling in France. This is not a market contradiction, it is exactly what Anses intended to signal when speaking of proven pharmacological effects. Clinical literature thus validates the agency's interpretation, not the reverse.
For you, the practical consequence comes down to one sentence: treat this product with the seriousness you would give to a drug, because that is what it is becoming.
Drug interactions
This is the point on which Anses calls for the greatest vigilance. Let's look at what the literature actually establishes, because the picture is more nuanced than often read.
What studies show in humans
A systematic review published in Planta Medica analyzed 66 clinical studies of pharmacokinetic interaction involving six popular plants, including goldenseal and berberine, with 8 studies for this group. Its conclusion is measured: at commonly recommended doses, none of these plants acts as a strong or moderate inhibitor or inducer of cytochrome P450 or P-glycoprotein. Effects considered weak are noted for goldenseal and berberine, in the form of an inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6.
In other words, based on available clinical data, the effect is real but weak, and the overall body of evidence remains limited in number of studies.
What animal studies show, and why they matter
A study published in the Journal of Food and Drug Analysis used cyclosporine as a probe substrate in rats, cyclosporine being precisely an immunosuppressant with a narrow therapeutic window. The results are striking: a single dose of coptis rhizome reduced the maximum concentration of cyclosporine by 56.9% and total exposure by 56.4% ; after repeated administration, these reductions reached 70.4% and 68.7%.
Note the direction: the concentration of the drug decreases. For an immunosuppressant, a drop in exposure of more than half does not cause a spectacular adverse effect: it exposes to treatment failure, which can be far more serious and far less visible. This is exactly what the Anses describes when it states that taking berberine alongside a treatment can inhibit the effects of that treatment. An interaction does not always manifest as discomfort: sometimes, it manifests as a medication that no longer does its job.
Honest caveat: this is an animalstudy, examining a plant extract rather than isolated berberine. It does not allow us to quantify the effect in humans. It indicates a direction and potential magnitude, for a medication where the stakes are major.
The medications cited by Anses
| Medication | Category | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Metformin | Antidiabetic | Cumulative hypoglycemic effects |
| Cyclosporine | Immunosuppressant | Narrow therapeutic window, risk of treatment failure |
| Digoxin | Cardiology | Narrow therapeutic margin |
| Carbamazepine | Neurology and psychiatry | Delicate therapeutic balance |
| Losartan | Antihypertensive | Possibly additive blood pressure effects |
A drug with a narrow therapeutic margin is a medication where the gap between an effective dose and a problematic dose is small. Even a modest variation in its blood concentration can shift from insufficient effect to excessive effect. This is why cyclosporine and digoxin dominate this issue.
The course of action is unambiguous : if you are taking any treatment whatsoever, do not take berberine without consulting your doctor or pharmacist. This is not a precautionary statement, it is the explicit recommendation of a health authority, supported by pharmacokinetic data.
Who should not take it
Children and adolescents. Without exception in a self-medication context.
Pregnant or breastfeeding women. French regulations already require that labeling include a warning discouraging use in pregnant women, which is rare and significant.
People with diabetes. This is the central paradox: berberine is most often consumed to regulate blood sugar, and it is precisely to this population that the agency advises against it, due to the risk of hypoglycemia and interactions with antidiabetic drugs, with metformin being cited. Clinical trials moreover confirm the blood sugar-lowering effect: in the 2008 study, it was comparable to that of metformin. A real effect is not a risk-free effect.
People suffering from liver or heart disorders, given the identified effects on blood pressure and heart rhythm.
And more broadly, people under medical treatment.
Signs that should lead to stopping and consulting
- A yellowing of the skin or eyes, unusual fatigue or dark urine: consult without delay.
- Signs ofhypoglycemia : tremors, sweating, feeling of weakness, discomfort.
- Dizziness or a sensation of the room spinning when standing up, which may indicate low blood pressure. Marked or persistent
- digestive disorders , the most consistently reported effect in trials.Stop taking it and consult reporting the product, its dose and duration. Also report to the national
Arrêtez la prise et consultez en signalant le produit, sa dose et sa durée. Signalez également au dispositif national de nutrivigilance : on this molecule, reports have concrete value, with the Anses opinion being based precisely on the collection of cases reported in France, Europe, and the United States.
Doses, and the European gap
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| Pharmacological threshold adopted by Anses | 400 mg per day, without excluding effects at lower doses |
| Dose from the 2020 Lancet trial | 0.3 g twice daily, or 600 mg per day |
| Dose from the 2008 Metabolism trial | 0.5 g three times daily, or 1500 mg per day |
| Regulatory ceiling in Belgium | 10 mg per day of isoquinoline alkaloids expressed as berberine |
| Regulatory ceiling in France | None. Labeling must include a pregnancy warning |
Place the figures side by side. Belgium caps it at 10 mg per day, precisely to prevent these products from falling into the drug category. Clinical trials use 600 to 1500 mg per day. France sets no ceiling. The same product can therefore be illegal on the other side of the border and perfectly marketable here. This doesn't mean France is wrong or Belgium is right: it means the dossier is not settled, and the consumer cannot rely on the idea that a product on sale is necessarily suitable for their situation. Check the actual content per dose and per day.
What the law allows you to say
Anses explicitly reminds us: no health claims are currently authorized under European regulations, neither for berberine-containing plants nor for substances in the group of isoquinoline alkaloids.
The situation is remarkable: these supplements are massively sold for regulating blood glucose and cholesterol levels, when no such effects can legally be claimed. And this remains true even if clinical trials demonstrate such effects: a published study is not an authorized claim. These two universes are distinct, and confusing one with the other is precisely what regulation seeks to prevent.
You will encounter berberine presented as a "natural Ozempic". This comparison is misleading on two counts. First because it equates a dietary supplement to a prescribed and monitored medication, whose mechanism of action is different. Furthermore, because it constitutes an unauthorized claim. The irony of the matter: berberine is indeed becoming a medication, but through the regulatory pathway, that of phase 2 and 3 trials, not through marketing slogans. We discuss this in our dedicated article, berberine and natural Ozempic.
Clinical trials show a molecule that is well tolerated in selected and monitored participants. Anses evaluates what happens outside this framework, and advises against the product for several populations, including the one the market targets most. These two truths complement each other, and the second matters more for you, because you buy off-the-shelf. Check your prescription before your shopping cart, and be wary of any brand that sells berberine as a harmless plant capsule.
Frequently asked questions
Anses' opinion
Is berberine dangerous?
Two levels must be distinguished. In published clinical trials, it is generally well tolerated: effects are essentially digestive, and a randomized trial against placebo on 1108 participants reported no serious adverse effects. But Anses, which evaluates over-the-counter sales conditions and not a controlled trial, concludes that there are established pharmacological effects and recommends that several populations not consume it. Both findings are accurate: they do not apply to the same situation.
What exactly does Anses' opinion say?
Requested by the DGCCRF in April 2018, Anses published its opinion on November 25, 2019. It confirms established pharmacological effects from 400 mg per day, on blood pressure and heart rate, on the nervous system, on the immune system and on metabolism, without excluding that these effects exist at lower doses. It emphasizes that this dose is likely exceeded by many products on the French market.
Is berberine a medication or a supplement?
Clinical literature does in fact provide an answer: berberine, in the form of ursodeoxycholate, is undergoing pharmaceutical development with Phase 2 trials published in JAMA Network Open and Nature Communications, and Phase 3 trials currently underway. One does not conduct such trials on a substance without effects. In France, it remains marketed as a dietary supplement without dose limits, which explains the Anses position and the very low ceiling set in Belgium.
What should be understood about berberine safety?
That it is a substance with proven pharmacological effects, regulated by a health agency opinion, and not an ordinary supplement. That Anses recommends that several populations avoid consuming it, including people with diabetes, pregnant and nursing women, children and adolescents, and people suffering from liver or heart disorders. That drug interactions are numerous and documented. And that no health claims are authorized.
Affected Populations
Who should not take berberine?
Anses recommends that children and adolescents, pregnant or nursing women, people with diabetes, and people suffering from liver or heart disorders should not consume berberine-based supplements. It also advises against these supplements for people taking medications. The list is extensive and precisely covers part of the audience these products typically target.
Why is berberine discouraged for people with diabetes?
This is the central paradox of this issue. Berberine is most often consumed to regulate blood sugar levels, yet Anses specifically recommends that people with diabetes not take it. The reason lies in the risk of hypoglycemia and interactions with antidiabetic treatments, with metformin being explicitly cited. In other words, the population most commercially targeted is the one the agency excludes.
Can berberine be taken during pregnancy?
No. Anses recommends that pregnant or nursing women should not consume berberine-based supplements, and French regulations already require that labeling of these products bear a warning discouraging their use by pregnant women. This is one of the rare situations where a warning statement is explicitly required on the label.
Can it be given to an adolescent?
No. Anses explicitly recommends that children and adolescents should not consume berberine-based supplements. This recommendation has no exceptions in a self-medication context, and any metabolic concerns in a young person warrant medical advice, not a supplement purchased online.
Interactions and Effects
Which medications does berberine interact with?
Anses specifically cites carbamazepine, cyclosporine, digoxin, losartan, and metformin. Regarding data, a systematic review of 66 clinical interaction studies concludes that at common doses berberine is not a potent or moderate cytochrome inhibitor, but does show a weak effect on CYP3A4 and CYP2D6. An animal study using cyclosporine as a probe, however, measured an exposure reduction of over half, which poses primarily a risk of treatment failure.
What does narrow therapeutic margin mean?
It designates a medication where the gap between the effective dose and the problematic dose is small. For these treatments, even a modest variation in blood concentration can tip from insufficient effect to excessive effect. This is precisely what an interaction can cause, which is why cases reported internationally predominantly concern this type of medication. Digoxin and cyclosporine are examples.
What are the side effects of berberine?
Trials are consistent: they are digestive disorders, with constipation and diarrhea leading, and their frequency depends on the dose. In the Lancet trial at 600 mg per day, constipation affected 1% of berberine participants versus less than 0.5% under placebo. In a trial at 1500 mg per day in people with diabetes, 34.5% experienced transient digestive disorders, with no observed liver or kidney damage. Anses adds risks of hypoglycemia and hypotension.
What signs should prompt stopping?
Marked or persistent digestive disorders, signs suggesting hypoglycemia such as tremors, sweating, or malaise, dizziness that may indicate hypotension, and especially yellowing of the skin or eyes, unusual fatigue, or dark urine, which warrant immediate medical consultation. Stop taking it and report the product, its dose, and duration.
Should berberine be stopped before surgery?
Given the identified effects on blood pressure and heart rate, as well as the risk of hypoglycemia, definitely inform your medical team during the preoperative consultation and follow their instructions. The general rule applies here more than ever: mention your supplements when asked about your medications.
Do clinical studies say the same thing as Anses?
They do not answer the same question. A trial measures what happens to selected participants, often without heavy associated treatment, and biologically monitored. An agency evaluates what happens when the molecule is sold freely to people with diabetes or on treatment, at non-capped doses. A molecule well tolerated in one setting may pose problems outside that setting: this is the entire logic of the opinion.
Does berberine damage the liver or kidneys?
In the 2008 trial in people with diabetes treated for three months at 1500 mg per day, no functional liver or kidney damage was observed. The meta-analysis on fatty liver reports only mild digestive effects. That said, one isolated French case associating jaundice and liver function abnormalities was documented by Anses, in a person consuming multiple products. Yellowing of the skin or eyes requires stopping and consulting a doctor.
Dose and Legal Framework
What dose of berberine is of concern?
Anses identifies proven pharmacological effects from 400 mg per day, while specifying that it is not excluded that these effects already exist at lower doses, which remains to be established. It especially emphasizes that this dose is likely exceeded by a large number of supplements present on the French market. So check the actual content per dose and per day.
Is there a maximum dose in France?
No, no maximum daily dose is currently defined in France. The situation varies significantly across Europe: Belgium has set a maximum daily dose of 10 mg of isoquinoline alkaloids expressed as berberine, specifically to prevent these products from entering the drug category, while other countries authorize, restrict, or prohibit them.
Is there an authorized health claim?
No. No health claims are authorized at the European level, neither for berberine-containing plants nor for substances in the isoquinoline alkaloid group. This is a point Anses explicitly recalls. A brand displaying an effect on blood sugar, cholesterol, or weight therefore falls outside the regulatory framework, even if studies exist elsewhere.
Is berberine a natural Ozempic?
This phrase circulates widely and is misleading in two ways. First, because it compares a dietary supplement to a prescribed and monitored medication with a different mechanism. Second, because it constitutes an unauthorized claim: no effect of this type can be asserted. Using this comparison to market amounts to promising a medicinal effect without the framework that should accompany it.
Glossary
- Berberine
- An isoquinoline alkaloid extracted from several plants, including barberry, with proven pharmacological effects according to Anses.
- Isoquinoline alkaloids
- Group of substances to which berberine belongs, and for which no health claims are authorized.
- Established pharmacological effect
- Proven action of a substance on the body, comparable to that of an active pharmaceutical ingredient.
- Narrow therapeutic index
- Refers to a medication where the gap between effective dose and problematic dose is small, making any interaction significant.
- Hypoglycemia
- Abnormal decrease in blood sugar levels, manifesting through tremors, sweating, or discomfort.
- Jaundice
- Yellowing of the skin and eyes, a sign that may indicate liver damage.
- Official referral
- Official request addressed to a health agency to evaluate a question, here by the DGCCRF.
- Umbrella review
- Synthesis of multiple meta-analyses on the same topic, the highest level of evidence in epidemiology.
- Probe substrate
- Medication used in research to measure the effect of a substance on the enzymes or transporters that eliminate it.
- Nutrivigilance
- National system allowing the reporting of adverse effects potentially linked to a dietary supplement.
Sources
The clinical studies cited below were identified via PubMed.
- Chen YX, et al. Berberine versus placebo for the prevention of colorectal adenoma recurrence: a multicenter randomized double-blind trial. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2020;5(3):267-275. DOI
- Li Z, et al. Berberine and health outcomes: an umbrella review. Phytotherapy Research, 2023;37(5):2051-2066. DOI
- Yin J, et al. Efficacy of berberine in patients with type 2 diabetes. Metabolism, 2008;57(5):712-717. DOI
- Nie Q, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of berberine in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: meta-analysis and systematic review. Journal of Translational Medicine, 2024;22(1):225. DOI
- Hermann R, von Richter O. Clinical data on medicinal plants as causes of pharmacokinetic interactions. Planta Medica, 2012;78(13):1458-1477. DOI
- Yu CP, et al. Activation of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A by coptis rhizome in vivo: ciclosporin as a probe substrate in rats. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 2017;26(2S):S125-S132. DOI
- Ji L, et al. Berberine ursodeoxycholate in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 2025;8(3):e2462185. DOI
- Harrison SA, et al. Phase 2 randomized controlled trial of berberine ursodeoxycholate in patients with presumed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and type 2 diabetes. Nature Communications, 2021;12(1):5503. DOI
- Kumar A, et al. Current knowledge and pharmacological profile of berberine: an update. European Journal of Pharmacology, 2015;761:288-297. DOI
- Anses. Opinion on the safety of use of plants containing berberine in the composition of dietary supplements, request 2018-SA-0095, November 25, 2019. anses.fr
- European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EC) 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. eur-lex.europa.eu


